Understanding Paint Circulation System
There are three models variant paint circulation system. Every model have
advantage and disadvantage of each. The system can comparison in some
factor.
The model are Dead End system, 2-Pipe system and 3rd Line
|
Factors
|
Dead End
|
2-Pipe
|
3rd Line
|
| Initial Cost | Least costly | Medium cost | Higher cost |
| Operating Cost | Low | Low | High |
| Ease of operation & maintenance | Very easy to operate, make adjustment & maintain |
Very easily to operate, make adjusment & maintain |
Good understanding of system needed to operate & make adjustment High maintenance required |
| Flexibility | Very flexible. New stations can be added & existing stations deleted or relocated easily. Can be easily converted to a full ciscilation system. Change in hose length and diameters easily accomodation. |
Limited adaptability to change, Re-engineering may be necessary with changes in system requirements |
Very flexyble system when changes have to beacconodation of new stations, deletion or recolation of existing stations & changes in hose lengths and diameters |
| Circulation | main line circulation only | Full circulation to gun/bell | Full circulation to gun/bell |
| Material | Only good for material not requiring circulation |
Good for all current material including mica | Good for all current material including mica |
| Fill volume inside piping | Low | Low | Highest |
| Pump volume & pressure | Low | Low | Usually Highest |
| Material wastage | Highest - non-circulating material have to purged out after each to prolonged stoppage. |
Minimal | Minimal |
Popularity: 18% [?]
Tags: none | June 20, 2007 on 3:41 pm | In Paint | |No Comments yet »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI



